Helga Zepp-LaRouche talar i Stockholm (video and transcript in English)

Helga Zepp-LaRouches tal nådde det sublima, när hon var huvudgäst i Stockholm på Schillerinstitutets seminarium den 11.1 2017. Seminariet handlade om möjligheterna att i samarbete med president Donald Trump komma till en ny internationell paradigm av nya relationer mellan nationer i världen av win-win-samarbete kring byggandet av den Nya Sidenvägen. Rubriken på seminariet var: "Donald Trump och den Nya Internationella Paradigmen".

The speech by Helga Zepp-LaRouche reached the sublime at the Stockholm EIR/Schiller Institute Seminar Wednesday, January 11, 2017. Speaking from the title "Donald Trump and the New International Paradigm" she developed the hopeful oppurtunities in new realignment of the world around the New Silk Road policy of China and the 100 nations and internaional institutions joining it.

Se videon av hela talet och utskriften med bilder (på engelska) här:

See the video with the whole speech and the transcript with pictures here:

http://schillerinstitute.org/highlite/2017/0111-stockholm/hzl-eir.html

Här kommer utskriften av hela hennes tal utan bilder på engelska:

Below is the transcript of her speech without pictures in English:

- Donald Trump and the New International Paradigm -
Speech by Helga Zepp-LaRouche Stockholm EIR/Schiller Institute Seminar
Wednesday, January 11, 2017

HUSSEIN ASKARY, Chairman Schiller Institute in Sweden,
welcomed the participants: Thank you very much everybody for attending
the seminar, "Donald Trump and the New International Paradigm."
Your Excellencies, and ladies and gentlemen, we are very, very
pleased that we have a special guest. It's all clear that the
interest for this theme is very big, and this is a very special;
there are many expectations on the new administration and new
policy, but there are also many challenges around the world. And
we have the honor of having Mrs. Helga Zepp-LaRouche, the founder
and chairwoman of the international Schiller Institute, who has
not only followed at very close range, followed developments
internationally, both strategic, economic and cultural, but she
herself and her association were actually contributing to what we
call this new paradigm in international politics. But this new
paradigm in international politics of course, we will hear from
Mrs. Helga Zepp-LaRouche.
We will have Mrs. Helga Zepp-LaRouche's presentation and
then I will make a short presentation and then we'll have a
break.... [applause]

HELGA ZEPP-LAROUCHE, President and founder of the
International Schiller Institute: Good day, ladies and gentlemen. We
are in indeed in very, very fascinating times. And I think there
is much reason to be hopeful. I know that for the last 16 years,
most people in the United States and Europe thought there is no
great future. But I think that there is an accumulation of
strategic realignments which have shaped up over the last three
years, but especially in the last year, where one can actually
see the potential for a completely new kind of relation among
nations is on the horizon and that we may actually have the
chance to bring a peaceful world.
Now, obviously, in the system of globalization as we have
known it, especially since the collapse of the Soviet Union, that
system is completely unhinged and this is cause for a lot of
freaked out reactions by those people who were the beneficiaries
of that system of globalization, but I will hopefully be able to
develop that this is a temporary phenomenon, and it will be
replaced by some more optimistic developments.
What we see right now is a completely new paradigm emerging,
a system which is based on the development of all, a "win-win"
potential to cooperate among nations and obviously the idea for
what was the axiomatic basis of the globalization system since
'91 to insist on a unipolar world, is failing, or has failed
already. And with that, a system which tried to maintain this
unipolar world with the policy of regime change, of color
revolution, or humanitarian intervention, or so-called
humanitarian intervention to defend democracy and human rights,
which obviously has led the world to a terrible condition, but
this is now coming to an end.
So obviously, the statement by Francis Fukuyama at the end
of the Soviet Union that this was the "end of history" and that
there would be now only democracy, was really pretty sure;
because you have a complete backlash right now, which takes
different forms in different in different parts of the world
against this system of globalization, and in the Asian countries
it takes the form of more and more countries joining with the New
Silk Road perspective offered by China, the offer to work
together in a "win-win" cooperation with the Belt and Road
Initiative which is now already involving more than 100 nations
and international organizations; and is already engaged in the
largest infrastructure project in the history of mankind.
This new paradigm economic system, already involves 4.4
billion people; it is already in terms of spending, in terms of
buying power in today's dollars, 12 times as big as the Marshall
Plan was after the Second World War, and is open for every
country to join, including Sweden, including the United States,
including every other country on the planet. And I will talk
about that in a little while.
And in the trans-Atlantic sector you have a different kind
of anti-globalization revolt, which is still ongoing, it's not
yet settled how this will turn out. It started in a visible form
with the vote of the British population in June last year with
the Brexit, which was the first real upset; everybody was totally
unexpecting it, except a few insiders. This anti-globalization
revolt was obviously continued with the election of President
Donald Trump in the United States; it was continued with the "no"
to the Italian referendum organized by Prime Minister Matteo
Renzi, to change the Constitution. And its coming to all of
these developments, Brexit, Trump, no to the referendum in Italy,
is that is caused by a fundamental feeling of injustice of ever
larger parts of the population which were victims of that system,
which increasingly made the rich richer, made more billionaires
richer, but destroying successively the middle range of society,
and making the poor poorer. It is my deepest conviction that
that revolt will continue until the causes of this injustice are
removed, and it will continue, it will hold the measuring rod to
President Trump, if he will fulfill his election promises; and if
he would not do that I believe the same people would turn against
Trump as they turned against Hillary.
So that means that the future of the European Union and the
euro is very doubtful. We have elections coming in this year in
France in April. This election as of now is completely up in the
air. There is no firm prediction possible. You have a very
tumultuous situation in Italy, where a coup was just attempted by
Beppe Grillo and Verhofstadt [in the European Parliament] which
failed, trying to get the Five Star Party into the Liberal Group
[ALDE] in the European Parliament, which was rejected by the
Liberal Group so it didn't function. Then you will have elections
in Holland, and in September in Germany which, you know, the star
of Mrs. Merkel is also no longer as shiny as it may have been a
while ago.
So we are looking into dramatic changes.
Now, let me start with the Trump election. Now, I have in my
whole political life, which is now becoming quite long, several
decades -- I have never in my whole political life, seen such
hysteria on the side of the neo-cons, on the side of the
mainstream politicians, on the side of the liberal media, as
concerning Trump. Now, admittedly, Trump does not fulfill the
behavior code of Baron von Kligel, who was a German in the 18th
century who developed the code for good diplomatic behavior. But
what was caused Trump, is that he simply promised end the
political paradigm which was the basis of eight years of George
W. Bush and eight years of Barack Obama, which was a direct
continuation of the Bush-Cheney policy.
And it was a good thing, because it was very clear that if
Hillary Clinton would have won the election in the United States,
that all the policies she was pursuing, including an no-fly zone
over Syria, and an extremely bellicose policy towards Russia and
China, would have meant that we would have been on the direct
course to World War III. If you have any doubts about that I'm
perfectly happy to answer questions about that, in the question &
answer period.
So the fact that Hillary did not win the election was
extremely important for the maintenance of world peace. And I
think that of all the promises that Trump made so far, the fact
that he said, and by the appointment of these different cabinet
members, if they all get through the nomination process in the
Senate, that he will normalize the relationship between the
United States and Russia, is, in my view {the most important
step}. Because if the relationship between the United States and
Russia is decent, and is based on trust and cooperation, I think
there is a basis to solve all other problems in the world. And
if that relationship would be in an adversary condition, world
peace is in extreme danger.
So from my standpoint, there is reason to believe that this
will happen. The Russian reaction has been very moderately, but
optimistic that this may happen. If you look at the appointments,
you have several cabinet members and other people in other high
posts who are also for improving the relationship with Russia,
such as Tillerson who is supposed to become Secretary of State;
General Flynn, who is a conservative military man but also for
normalization with Russia, and many others, so I think this is a
good sign.
Now, if you look at the reaction of the neo-con/neo-liberal
faction on both sides of the Atlantic to this election of Trump,
you can only describe it as {completely} hysterical. The
{Washington Post} today as an article "How To Remove Trump from
Office," calling him a liar, just every derogative you can
possibly imagine, just an all-in-one unbelievable; the reaction
in Germany was -- von der Leyen, the Defense Minister, in the
morning after the election said she was "deeply shocked," this
was "terrible," this was a catastrophe, and it keeps going like
that. So they have not recovered.
And then naturally, you have the reports by the different
U.S. intelligence services, Clapper, Brennan, Comey from the FBI,
they all put out the fact that that it was Russian hacking of the
emails of the DNC and Podesta which would have stolen the
election, because they would have shifted the view of the
Americans to vote for Trump.
Now, I think this is ridiculous. Not only have many cyber
experts, also in Europe but also in the United States, already
said that all the signs are that it was not a hacking but an
insider leak giving this information out, is more and more
likely, and there's absolutely {zero} proof that it was Russian
hacking. Naturally, what is being covered up with this story is
that was the "hacking" about? It was "hacking" of emails that
proved that Hillary Clinton manipulated the election against
Bernie Sanders! That is not being talked about any more; but if
there was any thought, I would say, look there, and there are
many people who recognize, for example, a very important French
intelligence person with the name of Eric Denécé who is a
top-level think tanker in France who said: Well, it is quite
clear why they put out this story, because the neo-cons had to
expect the great cleanup and many of them would lose their
positions, and this is why they basically all agreed on this
story and changed the narrative.
The real narrative is that it was the injustice of the
neoliberal system of globalization which simply violated the
interests of the majority of the people, especially in the "rust
belt." Hillary Clinton in the election campaign was so arrogant
that she didn't even go to Ohio or some of the other states which
are formerly industrialized. Where, you have to see that the
United States, contrary to what mostly is reported in the Western
media in Europe, the United States is in a state of economic
collapse. They have for the first time, a shrinking
life-expectancy; there is one indicator which shows if a society
is doing good or bad, and that is if the life-expectancy
increases or shrinks. In the United States it's shrinking for
the first time for both men and women. In the period of 16 years
of Bush-Cheney and Obama, which you can take as one package, the
suicide rate has quadrupled in all age brackets; the reasons
being alcoholism, drug addiction, hopelessness, depression
because of unemployment. There are about 94 million Americans
who are of working age who are not even counted in the
statistics, because they have given up all hope of ever finding a
job again. If you have recently travelled in the United States,
the United States is really in a terrible condition; the
infrastructure is in a horrible condition, and people are just
not happy.
So the vote, therefore, the narrative, that was the reason
why Hillary was voted out because she was being perceived as the
direct continuation of these 16 years, and so the attempt to
change that narrative by saying it was "Russian hacking" is
pretty obvious.
Now, however, we have now I think ten days or nine days
left, until the new President comes in. And this is not a period
of relaxation, because again, in an unprecedented way, the old
team of Obama is trying to create conditions for the incoming
President Trump to force him to continue on the pathway of Obama.
For example, just a couple of days ago, they started a deployment
of a U.S. and NATO troops to be deployed at the Russian border in
the Baltics, in Poland, and Romania, through the German city of
Bremerhaven, where 6,000 troops landed with heavy military
equipment; for example, the U.S. Abrams tanks, Paladin artillery,
Bradley fighting vehicles, 2,800 pieces of military hardware, 50
Black Hawk helicopters, involving 1,800 personnel; 400 troops to
be attached to the 24 Apache helicopters.
Now, obviously, the deployment of this is supposed to be a
provocation against Russia and it's supposed to make it very
difficult for Trump to start to improve relations.
A second area where you can see this effort to pin Trump
down is the question of the THAAD missiles in Korea, where
basically now North Korea has claimed to be able to be able to
launch their ICBM anywhere, any time; and according to Chinese
experts, the United States is entirely to blame why North Korea
is behaving this way.
South Korea with the outgoing President Park Geun-hye, who
may be impeached soon, actually in days or weeks, she agreed to
have a special brigade of 1,000-2,000 task force which is
supposed to eliminate the Pyongyang command under conditions of
war, including Kim Jong-un; and obviously this is aggravating the
situation because given the history of such things, one is not
sure when is the moment of such action.
Thirdly you can see it with the deployment of the U.S.
aircraft carrier group {USS Carl Vinson} to the Asia, in the
vicinity of China. This aircraft carrier is of the Nimitz-class
nuclear-powered, and it will arrive exactly on 20th of January,
the day Trump is will take office. {Global Times} the official
Chinese newspaper said that this deployment is set to disrupt
potential talks between China and other countries in the region;
naturally, also it's supposed to put a sour note on the
U.S.-China relations.
There are other efforts to change and determine the
narrative in the post-Obama period. Ash Carter, the U.S.
Secretary of Defense, just gave a press conference where he said
that it was only the United States which was fighting ISIS in
Syria. Now, that takes some nerve to say that, because everybody
in the whole world knows that without President Putin's decision
to militarily intervene in Syria starting in September 2015, and
with the tremendous support of the Russian Aerospace Forces for
the fighting of the Syrian troops, this military situation in
Syria would have never developed. And it was to the contrary,
the very dubious behavior of the United States supporting various
kinds of terrorist groups which prolonged this process and slowed
it down.
But also in the attempt to pin down the narrative, of
course, John Kerry, who a week or so ago, gave a speech saying
that it was the British Parliament which would have prevented the
U.S. military intervention in Syria. Now -- I mean, all of these
people must think that the whole world has a very short memory,
because I remember very vividly that it was Gen. Michael Flynn,
in his capacity as head of the DIA, [Defense Intelligence
Agency], who had put out a public statement that it was the
intention of the Obama administration to build up a caliphate in
the region, in order to have regime-change against Assad, and he
was then fired by [DNI] Clapper. And it is of a certain irony
that just on Friday, when Trump met with Clapper, Brennan and
Comey, in the Trump Tower where these three gentlemen wanted to
impress Trump with their story about the Russian hacking; the
other person who was with Trump was General Flynn, who is now in
the driver's seat [to be National Security Advisor]. So anyway,
you can expect the truth not be suppressed forever. And as a
matter of fact, it was in the moment shortly before the U.S.
military intervention in 2013, the U.S. military action was
prepared to occur Sunday evening; we had gotten that from
well-informed circles in Washington, and then in the very last
minute the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Martin
Dempsey went to Obama and said, "You should not a start a war
where you don't know how it ends. And if you don't ask the
Congress you will be impeached, or you run the risk of being
impeached." And only because of that Obama went to ask the U.S.,
Congress, the U.S. Congress voted no, and the U.S. military
intervention was prevented.
So this was quite different. And you know this attempt to
fix the narrative will not be successful.
Now, I cannot tell you what this Trump administration is
going to be. I think I mentioned the one point, I'm pretty
confident about: I think we will see probably only by February
or even into March who will be actually in his cabinet, who will
get approved by the Senate. But there are other interesting
elements, for example: Trump had promised in the election
campaign to invest $1 trillion into the renewal of the
infrastructure in the United States. That is very good, as I
said, because the United States urgently needs repair. It will,
however, only function if at the same time, another promise by
Trump, namely, what he promised in October in North Carolina,
that he would implement the 21st Century Glass-Steagall Act, will
also be carried out, because the trans-Atlantic financial system
remains on the verge of bankruptcy. You could have a repetition
of the 2008 financial crash at any moment; and {only} if you have
a Glass-Steagall law in the tradition of Franklin D. Roosevelt,
what Roosevelt did in 1933 by separation of the banks, by getting
rid of the criminal element of the banking system, and then
replacing it by a credit policy in the tradition of Alexander
Hamilton, can you remedy this situation. Otherwise, you cannot
finance $1 trillion in infrastructure.
But one step in a positive direction is the fact that for
example the former deputy foreign minister of China, and
chairwoman of the Foreign Affairs committee of the National
People's Congress, Mme. Fu Ying, made a speech in New York, about
six weeks ago, where she said that indeed the Trump
infrastructure program can be a bridge to the New Silk Road
program of China. And that is quite the case: Just yesterday,
Trump met with Jack Ma who is the chief executive of Alibaba, a
Chinese e-commerce firm, and Jack Ma said that he can help Trump
to create 1 million jobs in the United States by initiating a
platform for U.S. small businessmen to sell to Chinese consumers
over the next five years, and vice versa, how the Chinese can
invest in the United States. Trump afterwards said this was a
great meeting, we will do great things together; and Jack Ma said
that Trump was a very smart man and they got along very well.
So this is very good, because the Schiller Institute already
in 2015 published a report for the United States to join the New
Silk Road, which is a whole approach how you have to have a fast
train system for the United States; as you know, China built as
of the end of 2014, 20,000 km high-speed train systems. China
wants to have to {50,000 km} by 2020, connecting every major city
in China with a fast train system. And the United States has
none.
So the United States urgently needs a fast train system
connecting the East Coast, the West Coast and the Midwest. Build
some new science cities in the South, get rid of the drought in
the Southwest, California and the other states. So there are
many, many things which urgently need to be done.
OK. Now, let me make a few remarks about the Schiller
Institute, given the fact that many of you may not know much
about us. And I want to underline the fact that we are not
commentators on this whole question, but that we are responsible
for many of the ideas which are now coming into effect.
The Schiller Institute was created by me in 1984, and it
was, at that time we had the still the intermediate-range missile
crisis, which brought the world to the verge of World War III;
if you remember, the Pershing 2, the SS20, where there was a very
short warning time, in permanent alert; and the relationship
between Europe and the United States was really in a terrible
condition.
So I created the Schiller Institute with the idea that you
needed an institute, a think tank to put the relations among
nations on a completely different basis. One of the most
important aspects of the work was to work towards the
establishment of a just, new world economic order, in the
tradition of the Non-Aligned Movement. And there, my husband,
already in 1975, had proposed to replace the IMF with an
International Development Bank, which would organize large
credits for technology transfer from the industrialized countries
to the developing sector, to overcome the underdevelopment.
That proposal went into the Colombo Resolution of the
Non-Aligned Movement in 1976 in Sri Lanka. So we had the idea
that that policy had to come back on the agenda, that we had to
create economic development in the southern hemisphere, so that
every human being on this planet could have dignified potential
their lives, develop all the potentialities embedded in them.
But from the beginning, we said that such a new world
economic order can only function if it's combined with a
Classical Renaissance, that we have to reject the popular culture
as it is associated with modern globalization, because it is
depraved and degenerate. And that we had to go back to the
revival, a Renaissance of the best traditions of every culture
and have a dialogue among them. For example, in Germany,
obviously you would emphasize the German Classical culture of
Schiller, Beethoven, the whole Classical music; in China, you
would emphasize Confucius; in India you would emphasize the Vedic
writings, Tagore, and so forth. So you would go and revive in
every country simply what they have contributed to universal
history and make that known.
Now, the present policy, of a "win-win cooperation" is
exactly an echo of what we had proposed since '84, and to replace
geopolitics with an approach of the common aims of mankind. In
1984, my husband, Mr. LaRouche, also uniquely predicted the
collapse of the Soviet Union. He said if the Soviet Union would
stick to their then-existing policies of the Ogarkov Plan, that
they would collapse in five years. Now, there was nobody else
who said the Soviet Union would collapse; it was completely
unthinkable, but we observed the economic problems and on Oct.
12, 1988, my husband and I made a press conference in Berlin, in
the Bristol Kempinski Hotel, where we said Germany will soon be
unified -- also nobody believed that at the time -- and Germany
should adopt the development of {Poland} as a model for the
transformation of the Comecon with high technology.
Now, in '89 therefore, when the Berlin Wall came down, we
were the only ones who were not surprised. As a matter of fact,
we immediately published a report, how the unified Germany should
develop Poland, and we called this program, the "Productive
Triangle Paris-Berlin-Vienna," which is an area the size of
Japan; it had the highest concentration of industry and the idea
was to develop development corridors from that Productive
Triangle to Poland, Warsaw, to Kiev, to the Balkans, and
transform the Comecon that way. It was before the D.D.R.
collapsed; and here if that had been picked up, maybe the Soviet
Union and the Comecon would not have collapsed.
Anyway: Because you had Bush, Thatcher and Mitterrand, they
did not like this at all, so in '91, when the Soviet Union
collapsed, we immediate proposed to prolong this program of the
Productive Triangle into the Eurasian Land-Bridge: The idea that
you would connect the population and industrial centers of Europe
with those of Asia, through development corridors. The Iron
Curtain was no longer there, so it was the natural thing to have
infrastructure corridors to develop the landlocked areas of
Eurasia.
Now we proposed at the time to all the countries of Eurasia,
and the only country which responded positively was China. So in
1996, they organized a very big conference in Beijing, called
"The Development of the Regions along the Eurasian Land-Bridge,"
and I was one of the speakers there. And China at that point
declared the development of the Eurasian Land-Bridge to be the
long-term perspective of China until the year 2010.
As you know, then came '97 the Asia crisis; '98 the Russian
GKO crisis, so this whole development became interrupted. But it
basically did not stop us from making conferences about this
proposal on five continents, all the U.S. cities, all the
European cities; even in Latin America, São Paolo, Rio, New
Delhi, even some African countries, Australia. We kept
organizing for this idea that the natural next phase of the
evolution of mankind would be the infrastructure connections of
the entire planet.
Obviously, what happened in '99 also was the repeal of the
Glass-Steagall Act in the United States, which gave way to the
unregulated speculation, leading to the present bubble.
Now, in September 2013, when Xi Jinping in Kazakhstan
announced the New Silk Road, we simply took all the different
studies we had made in these 24 years, and published them, and we
called it: "The New Silk Road Becomes the World Land-Bridge."
This is a comprehensive proposal which has the yellow line there
in the middle between China and Central Asia; this was the
initial One Belt, One Road proposal by China, and we added simply
-- they had the Maritime Silk Road -- but we had a whole
infrastructure program for Africa, for the South of Europe, the
Balkans, many corridors, including a Bering Strait Tunnel
connecting the Eurasian infrastructure with the American system,
with highways and high-speed trains all the way to Chile and
Argentina. And eventually, when all of this is built, you can go
by maglev train from the southern tip of South America to the
Cape of Good Hope in Africa.
We published this proposal; and the actual book you can find
at the book table, including an early report about this, from
1997. The first report we published in German, in '91. This is
not just about connection of infrastructure, but it has all the
scientific conceptions of Mr. LaRouche's notion of physical
economy.
Mr. LaRouche is probably the only economist in the West who
deserves that name, because all the other neo-liberal economists
have been so wrong in their predictions that they should probably
take another job. Mr. LaRouche has given up his own scientific
method and in this report you find there such extremely important
conceptions as the connection between energy flux density in the
production process and the relative potential population density,
which can be maintained with that energy flux density; and there
are other such important conceptions.
So this report was immediately published in China; the
Chinese translated it into Chinese. We presented it in China in
2015. It was recommended by all the people who presented to all
Chinese scholars, as the standard text on the Silk Road; and it
has been sent to all major faculties and universities in China.
It was also published in Arabic, as you will hear about from
Hussein Askary. And it is now coming out shortly in Korean, in
German, and we have requests in other languages to come out also.
So, while we were publishing these reports, the New Silk
Road promoted by China which has a few different names -- first
they called it One Belt, One Road; now they call it the Belt and
Road Initiative; I always call it the "New Marshall Plan Silk
Road," so that people get an idea. In any case, this policy of
China has taken on a breathtaking dynamic. (Next slide)
In the meantime, many of these proposals are in different
phases of realization. It has the Maritime Silk Road which is
the outer line. In the meantime, China is building six economic
corridors -- as I said, it involves 70 nations, and over 30
international large organization, 4.4 billion people, and
trillions in investments. And as I said, already now it's 12
times bigger than the Marshall Plan was.
(Next slide). This is the original One Belt, One Road,
connecting China and Central and West Asia through an economic
corridor. In June 2015, China and the five Central Asian
governments agreed to build that and additional routes are being
planned to go into Afghanistan. One is already going into Iran;
when President Xi was in Iran last year, he promised, -- or they
both promised that they would extend this New Silk Road beyond
Iran into Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Turkey.
(Next) This is the new Eurasian Land-Bridge which connects
China with Western Europe and it has shortened already the
transport time for cargo, to two to three weeks from China --
different cities, Chengdu, Chongqing, Yiwu, Duisburg, Lyon,
Rotterdam, Hamburg, from five weeks via ocean. Already by
mid-2016, there were over 2,000 rail shipments from China to
Europe, and it is picking up speed. All the cities in Europe
that are termini, such as Madrid, Lyon, Duisburg, they're all
happy; they realize that they have tremendous benefits from it.
(Next. No, the next one, the China-Mongolia) This is
China-Mongolia-Russia corridor. In June 2016, the three
presidents signed a trilateral economic partnership, at the 11th
Shanghai Cooperation Organization meeting; and this corridor
alone involves 32 projects.
(Next) This is the China-Pakistan economic corridor, which
is creating 700,000 new jobs in Pakistan. It will produce 10,400
MW power capacity and the investment of 46 billion by the Chinese
in this corridor equals all the foreign investment since 1970 in
Pakistan.
(Next) This is the China-Myanmar-Bangladesh corridor. This
creating for the first time an express highway between India and
China, and it goes through Bangladesh and Myanmar. This corridor
will be 1.65 million km long; it will encompass 440 million
people.
(Next). The China-Indochina Peninsula corridor. This will
be a highway/rail and high-speed transport system connecting the
ten largest cities of the region.
(Next) Africa -- Djibouti-Ethiopia. [showing picture of
refugees instead] Leave this picture please; this is very
important. Because as we know Europe has been in large part
destabilized by the refugee crisis, and there {is} a very big
incentive, one would think, for Europeans to help develop Africa.
But so far it is not coming from Europe, it's coming from China,
India and Japan.
So, the Djibouti-Ethiopia railway just opened yesterday, so
this is extremely good news. It opened yesterday, from Djibouti
to Addis Abeba, 750 km and it was built by China; it employed
about 20,000 Ethiopians and 5,000 Djiboutian, and it will be
connected to the standard gauge railway in Kenya, which again,
created 30,000 jobs. And this will obviously, among other things,
transform the port of Mombasa and it will take cargo and
passengers to the Ugandan border in one-tenth of the time it
takes by road. A professor from the University of Nairobi
School of Diplomacy, Prof. Gerishon Ikiara said, and I agreed,
that this whole program will "radical transform African
participation in global trade in the next two decades and will
catalyze the industrial transformation of Africa."
Now, there is another extremely important project (next),
which is the Transaqua project. Here you see the cover story of
a Memorandum of Understanding between the Lake Chad Basin
Commission and the Chinese engineering firm PowerChina. Now
PowerChina is the company which built the Three Gorges Dam and
several other large projects so they really know what they're
doing; and they agreed with this contract to do a feasibility
study about the Transaqua project.
This is the largest infrastructure project ever entertained
in Africa. It was developed in the late '70s by an Italian firm
Bonifica, and there, in particular, Dr. Marcello Vichi. Mr.
LaRouche has promoted this project since he got news of it,
because it was a perfect way of solving many problems at the same
time. As you know, Lake Chad is shrinking; it is presently only
about less than 10% of its original size, and it affects the life
of the entire people, 40 million people, in the Chad Basin. And
naturally, it is already having drought effects and so forth.
The concept is simply to transfer the water from the Congo
River, using the unused discharge of the Congo River water going
into the ocean. Now, the Congo River is the second largest river
in the world and it discharges 41,000 cubic meters/second into
the ocean -- unused. And the idea is to take only 3-4% of that
water and bring it into Lake Chad. There was a big campaign
trying to convince the people in the different states along the
Congo River, that it's stealing their water, and so forth, but
that was really an effort by the Greenies and it has no substance
to it whatsoever.
First of all, the idea is not to take the water from the
Congo River, but from the west bank tributaries at an altitude
that allows to bring water per gravity until the C.A.R./Chad
watershed, which is an elevation of 500 meters, and then pour it
into the Chari River which is a tributary of Lake Chad. So this
way you would create a 2,400 km long waterway which would bring
eventually 100 billion cubic meters of water per year into Lake
Chad and also create navigable infrastructure.
Obviously, the Republic of Congo would be also a big
beneficiary because it would give them access to a navigable
waterway, electricity production, regulation of rivers and so
forth.
PowerChina is now financing a feasibility study for a first
phase of the project which would involve building a series of
dams in the Democratic Republic of Congo, the Republic of Congo,
and the Central African Republic. It would also potentially
generate 15-25 billion kilowatt-hours of hydroelectricity through
the mass movement of water by gravity; it would potentially
create a series of irrigated areas for crops, livestock, of an
area of 50-70,000 sq km in the Sahel zone in Chad, in the
northeast of Nigeria, in the north of Cameroon, and in Niger. It
would also make possible an expanded economic zone basically
creating a new economic platform for agriculture, industry,
transportation, electricity for 12 Africa nations.
So PowerChina has put up $1.8 million for the first phase of
the feasibility study and if the construction starts, this is a
big project so it's not expected to be finished overnight, but it
will take generations: But it will create livelihoods for 40
million people in the basin. And this is just one project, but
there are many others. For example, Chinese Foreign Minister
Wang Yi is just on a five-nation tour through Africa [Jan. 7-12]
and was already in Madagascar, in Tanzania, is going to Zambia,
Nigeria, Republic of Congo, and he's inviting all Africa nations
to join the Belt and Road Initiative.
(Next) This is the expanded program of railways, nuclear
power, just transforming the entire African continent.
(Next) These are development plans for Latin America. The
blue lines you see there, these are the longstanding, proposed
high-speed railway routes in Latin America, which the Schiller
Institute has proposed. In 1982, when Mr. LaRouche was working
with President José López Portillo of Mexico on these projects,
he called it "Operation Juárez," to refer back to the best
traditions of Mexican-American cooperation. And these are all
projects which are obvious. If you look at the map of Africa or
Latin America, you don't see that kind of infrastructure! If you
see some railway, you see it as a small line from a mine to the
port to exploit the raw materials, but you don't have
infrastructure. And we had this idea, which Alexander von
Humboldt, by the way, proposed in 19th century, so it's not that
revolutionary; it's sort of obvious.
The red lines are the various Chinese proposals since the
BRICS summit in Brazil in July 2014. The solid red line is the
northern route of the Brail-Peru transcontinental rail line. This
was already agreed upon between the governments of Brazil and
China a year ago; but then they had the coup in Brazil, Dilma
Rousseff was impeached, so this came to a halt; also the new
government in Peru is very reluctant. But there's a big
movement: I just addressed a conference of economists in the
Amazon region two months ago, and there's a whole movement, also
associated with Fujimori party, who absolutely won the fight for
that rail line because it is the step to the future.
There are three additional lines, one line would be
including Bolivia into this rail line, and three additional lines
through Argentina and Chile; China also wants to build three
tunnels between Chile and Argentina to connect the Pacific and
the Atlantic.
(Next) This is the Nicaragua Canal which is in the early
stages of completion, also built by China. This will increase
the speed of global shipping between Belem and Shanghai and cut
the current route across the Atlantic and around Africa by 10% of
the time.
So I can only mention the most important projects. There are
many, many others. For example, China and Ecuador are building a
science city in Ecuador where President Correa at the recent
state visit of President Xi Jinping said that the collaboration
between Ecuador and China will mean that Ecuador soon will be on
the same level as all industrialized countries. They have the
idea to overcome poverty forever. The science city is going to
have the most advanced fields of science.
Bolivia -- Bolivia which used to be a coca producing country
is now cooperating on space projects with China, with Russia,
with India. So there is a completely new mood! I talked with
many Africans -- there was a big conference in Hamburg just a
couple of months ago, where the Africans said, there is a
completely new mood in Africa, there is a new paradigm: China,
Japan, India are all investing, and the Europeans, if they don't
shape up, they will become marginal and irrelevant. So there is a
completely new optimism caused by this dynamic.
Now, just on a diplomatic level, this process of integration
is going absolutely rapidly, especially since September last
year, when you had on Sept. 2-3, the Eastern Economic Forum in
Vladivostok where the integration of the Eurasian Economic Union
and the Belt and Road Initiative was on the table. The Japanese
Prime Minister Shinzo Abe participated in that conference, and
Japan is now massively investing in the Far East of Russia, in
terms of energy cooperation. Putin was just in Japan, as a state
visit; Abe will go on a state visit to Russia this year. They're
talking about settling the conflict concerning the Northern
islands, the Kuril Islands. They're talk about a peace treaty
between Russia and Japan, and obviously there is a complete
strategic realignment going on. President Duterte changed the
role of the Philippines from being the aircraft carrier for the
United States in the South China Sea, to now, collaborate with
China on economic cooperation, and also with Russia. The same by
the way, goes for Turkey, which is now shifting and working with
Russia, Iran and Syria, to bring peace to the region.
So there is a complete strategic realignment going on, which
the Western media and Western politicians have just not got it
yet. But this is very, very interesting.
So, then this continued from Vladivostok, immediately
afterwards on Sept. 4-5, the G20 Summit in Hangzhou, where China
took real leadership in saying the future recovery of the world
economy must be based on innovation {and} he made very clear that
this innovation must be shared with the developing countries, not
to hold up or hinder their development.
So, it's a completely new paradigm, and I'll say something
about that in a second.
Then you continue to the ASEAN meeting in Laos, the BRICS
meeting in Goa, India in October, the APEC meeting in Lima in
November, and it is involving all of these organizations and
spreading very fast.
Why is Europe not joining this? Look, Europe is in bad
shape. The EU is collapsing, the people in Italy {hate} by now
the ECB, they hate Merkel, they have Schäuble, they hold Merkel
responsible for the suffering of the population in Italy which is
now reaching dimensions like Greece; Greece was destroyed --
one-third of the Greek economy was destroyed by the austerity
policy of the Troika. And you know, there's {nothing} left of the
idea of unity in Europe. There are borders being built, Schengen
is dead; look at the Eastern European countries, they're simply
not--the Eastern European and Central European countries are
reorienting towards China! The 16+1 this is the Central and East
European Countries, they have extensive infrastructure
cooperation with China. China is building up the port in Piraeus
port in Greece; they're building a fast railway between Budapest
and Belgrade, and many other projects.
But the problem with Europe is that at least the European EU
bureaucracy and some governments, like the German one, they are
still on the old paradigm, the geopolitical paradigm of
globalization, of neoliberal policies, and they don't understand
that what China has proposed and what is now the basis of a very
close and determined strategic partnership between Russia and
China they have put on the agenda a different model: To overcome
geopolitics by a "win-win" strategy.
Now, most people at least in Europe and in the United States have
a very hard time to think that. They cannot imagine that
governments are for the common good, because we have not
experienced that for such a long time. The common idea of all
the think tanks, or most think tanks, is "China must have
ulterior motives"; "China is just trying to replace the
Anglo-American imperialism, with a Chinese imperialism." But that
is not true! I mean, I'm not naïve: I have studied this
extensively. I was in China for the first time in 1971, in the
middle of the Cultural Revolution. I have seen China, how it was
then, I travelled to Beijing, Tientsin, Qingdao, Shanghai, and to
the countryside, and so I know what {enormous} transformation
China has made in this period.
I went back to China in '96, after 25 years; already then it
was breathtaking. But if you look, the Chinese economic model
which has transformed 700 million people from extreme poverty to
a decent living standard; and China is now committed to develop
the interior region as part of their building of the New Silk
Road, to eliminate poverty from China totally by the year 2020,
and there are only 4% left in poverty right now.
Now, China is offering their Chinese economic model to all
participating countries in this New Silk Road conception and it
is in the interest of Sweden. It would be in the interest of
Germany because Germany is still, despite the Green insanity
which has deformed many brains, is still a productive country.
The German Mittelstand is still producing, I think, the third
largest number of patents in the world. It is their natural
interest to find cooperation not only in a bilateral cooperation,
but in investments in third countries. It would be in the {best
interest} of Germany -- if Germany is freaked out about the
refugees, which really has meant a complete destabilization of
the country, why is Germany not cooperating, with Russia, with
China, India, Iran, in the reconstruction of the Middle East? I
think, now that the Syrian government has started to rebuild
Aleppo, at least building the hospitals, the schools, the
Schiller Institute had proposed already in 2012 a comprehensive
proposal for the development of the entire Middle East, from
Afghanistan to the Mediterranean, from the Caucasus to the Gulf
States, and it would be in the absolute self-interest because --
sure you have to destroy ISIS and the terrorists with military
means. But then you have to create conditions where young people
in Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen, have a reason to become
doctors, scientists, teachers, so that they have a future, that
that way you drive out terrorism forever!
And if all the big neighbors would cooperate: Russia,
China, India, Iran, Egypt, Turkey, Italy, France, Germany,
Sweden, you could change this region in no time! And you will
hear about that soon from Hussein.
The same for Africa. The only minister in Germany who is
reasonable is the Development Minister Gerd Müller, because he
travels all the time to Africa and he says there will be the need
for many millions of jobs for the young people of Africa in the
next years; if we don't have them to create these jobs, many,
many millions of people will flee from hunger and war and
epidemics.
So would it not be in the self-interest that all the
European nations join hands {with} the Chinese Silk Road
initiative, and help to reconstruct and build up the economies of
southwest Asia and Africa? I think that that mission would also
really help to overcome the disunity of Europe, because you will
not solve that problem by looking at your navel; but you will
solve that problem by a joint mission for the greater good of
mankind.
So, I think that this is all possible. It can happen this
year, it can start this year, because China has committed itself
to have two big summits this year -- one summit will involve all
the heads of state of the Belt and Road Initiative, and it can be
the year of consolidation of the new paradigm.
Now there are a couple of elements which are also important
for this new paradigm, because we are not just talking about
infrastructure, and overcoming poverty. The next phase of the
evolution of man is not just to bring infrastructure to all
continents on this planet, but to continue that infrastructure
into close space around us. This is the first time formulated in
this way by the great German-American space scientist and rocket
scientist Krafft Ehricke, who was the designer of the Saturn V of
the Apollo project. He had this beautiful vision that if you
look at the evolution over a longer period of time, life
developed from the oceans with the help of photosynthesis; then
you had the development of ever higher species, species with a
higher metabolism, higher energy-flux density in their
metabolism.
Eventually man arrived. Man first settled at the oceans and
the rivers; then with the help of infrastructure, man developed
the interior regions of the continents; and we are now with the
World Land-Bridge picture -- go back to the first image -- this
will be, when it is built, the completion of that phase of the
evolution of mankind, by simply bringing infrastructure into all
landlocked areas of the world, and you will have -- with the
help of new methods to create water, with modern technologies,
create new, fresh water. For example, if you have peaceful
nuclear energy you can desalinate huge amounts of ocean water;
through the ionization of moisture in the atmosphere you can
create new waters to solve the problem of desertification. Right
now all the deserts are increasing; with these new technologies
you can reverse that, make the deserts green, and just make this
planet livable for all human beings!
But this is not the end: Mankind is not an Earth-bound
species. Mankind is the only species which is capable of
creative discovery, and the collaboration of all nations for
space exploration and space research {is} the next phase of our
evolution. Now China has a very ambitious space program. They
already landed the Yutu rover in 2014. Next year they will go to
the far side of the Moon, and eventually bring back helium-3 from
the far side of the Moon which will be an important fuel for
fusion power economy on Earth. Right now, we are very close to
making breakthroughs on fusion power. The Chinese EAST program
[Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak] has reached, I
think 50 million degrees for plasma for several seconds. And
just a couple of days ago, the stellarator in Greifswald,
Germany, reached 100 million degrees for -- I've forgotten how
many seconds. But it means that in a few years, we can have
fusion power! And that will create energy security, raw
materials security, on Earth.
So we're looking at a completely new phase of civilization,
and the far side of the Moon is very important because will not
have the disturbances of cosmic radiation, as you have on the
Earth-facing side of the Moon; the Sun and the Earth -- this far
side is shielded from a lot of this radiation so it will be
possible to put up much better telescopes, you will be able to
look into Solar System, into the Galaxy, into other galaxies
much, much farther than so far.
And I don't know if any one of you have seen these pictures
from the Hubble telescope: If you have not done that, please, go
home or next weekend, take the time to look at these pictures
from the Hubble telescope. I saw them, and I was completely
excited, because now we know that there are -- at least -- 2
trillion galaxies! Now, I have a good imagination, but I cannot
imagine that. It's just too big. And when you see these
pictures which have already been taken, you have galaxies which
look like the Milky Way; then you have totally different nebulas;
you have all formations. And not one galaxy is like the other.
Just imagine how big the Universe is?
And we know very, very little! But man is the only species
which {can} know! No donkey will ever know about the great
galaxies or -- no dog will ever be able to breed rabbits to have
better breakfast. They all like better breakfast, but they don't
know how to do it. Man is capable of overcoming every
limitation, and the mind of man is a physical force in the
Universe. We're not outside of the Universe, but what our mind
invents or discovers, {is} part of the Universe. And that is a
very exciting thing.
And there is lots to be found out about what is the origin
and essence of life. What governs the laws of the Universe?
What is the role of the mind in the Universe? I mean, these are
all extremely exciting questions, and they all prove that man is
not an Earth-bound species. So there is no need to be a Greenie,
because we can bring man's knowledge applied to expand our role
in the Universe. Even the ESA is now talking about a "Village on
the Moon."
Krafft Ehricke at the time had said, building an industrial
center on the Moon as a stepping stone for further travel of
space will be important. And you now see the shaping up of new
economic platforms. The first platform, Mr. LaRouche has
developed this notion of an economic platform to signify a period
of economic development which is governed by certain laws, like
for example, the development of the steam engine created a new
platform; the development of railway created a new platform;
fission is creating a new platform. And that platform is always
governed by the most advanced technologies of that time. And you
can already see that this infrastructure development of close-by
space, the first platform is simply that man is able to reach the
orbit! That's not self-evident. If you would have told man in
the Middle Ages that you will get on a spaceship and go into
orbit, he would have said you're crazy!
Now we can already see we have manned space travel and we
can now connect to where the Apollo project stopped after the
assassination of Kennedy, 40 years ago; but now China, India,
Russia, they all continue that process. India has also been
extremely ambitious space project.
And so, the first economic platform will be simply to leave
the planet Earth and to go into orbit; the second economic
platform of space research will be to have an industrial base on
the Moon and to eventually start to produce raw materials from
space. Because you will, as this continues, not always transport
materials from the Earth for your space travel, but once you have
fusion as a propulsion fuel where the speed will become much
larger, you will be able to take materials from asteroids, from
other planets, for your production and your requirements in
space. And then longer space travel between planets as the third
platform, which is already visible.
Now, I could -- this is very exciting, and once you start to
think about it, it shows that mankind is really capable of
magnificent achievements, and that we should really overcome
geopolitics. Geopolitics is like a little, nasty two-year-old
boy who is not yet educated and who knows nothing better than to
kick his brother in the knee. Now that's about the level of
geopolitics.
What Xi Jinping always talks about is that we have to form a
"community of destiny for the common future of mankind," and that
is exactly what the Schiller institute set out in '84, when we
said we have to fight for the common aims of mankind. And these
common aims of mankind must come first, and no nation should be
allowed to have a national interest or the interest of a group of
nations, if it violates this higher common aims of mankind. And
the areas of working together, a crash program for fusion, space
cooperation, and breakthroughs in fundamental science.
All of this however must be combined with a Classical
Renaissance, a dialogue of cultures on the highest level, and we
have already very successfully at Schiller Institute conferences,
practiced that, where we had European Classical music, Bach,
Beethoven, Verdi, Schubert, Schumann; Chinese Classical music,
Indian poetry. You have this coming Saturday in New York, a
beautiful event on style of civilizations, of cultures, where we
will have a Chinese professor talking about literati painting.
You know, in Chinese painting, you have poetry, calligraphy and
painting, in one. And for Westerners, it's a complete
revelation, because this does not exist in European painting.
People get completely excited because they discover that there
are beautiful things to discover in other cultures! And once you
study and know these other cultures, xenophobia and racism
disappears! Because you realize that it's beautiful that there
are many cultures, because there are universal principles to be
discovered in music, one musician will immediately understand
another musician because it's a universal language. Scientists
speak a universal language; they understand each other.
And so the future of civilization will be a dialogue between
Plato, Schiller, Confucius, Tagore, and many other great poets,
scientists of the past. So, if you give every child access to
these things, which is also in reach, I can see that we will have
a new era, a new civilization of mankind. And I would invite all
of you to not just look at it, but be part of it. [applause]